|










| |
| This page contains answers to common questions. |
|

This is a great place to start, especially since the
word "Imago" could mean anything from a Swedish musical group to a dental
procedure. Imago is classical Latin for "image". This word was
chosen because of the fundamental idea that within each of our brains is
an unconscious picture or an imprint of the partner that we seek. And we
will tend to unconsciously select a person who is uniquely qualified to
frustrate us. So if you experience intense frustration in your
relationship, you are probably hooked up with the right partner.


This is like the big secret. In our culture the whole
idea of marriage or the committed relationship has been miss told or
misrepresented. Frustration and disappointment will absolutely find it’s
way into your relationship. This is actually the way it's supposed to
happen in our western culture because we believe that we should have
absolute autonomy and freedom in who we select as our partners in marriage
or our committed relationships. For the most part, we do not let our
parents or anyone else tell us whom we will choose for our committed
relationships. We choose.

Yes, we all do. But this is not what we get. When we
fall in love, suddenly we see life in Technicolor. We nibble each other’s
ears and tell each other everything. We’re sexier, smarter, funnier, more
giving than at any other time. With our beloved, life is good. Well, this
is nature’s trick. When we are "in love", we tend to ignore differences
and focus only on the good stuff, like how much we laugh together, we both
like the same movies, or music, or food. It’s all a simple but effective
trick. Let me provide a personal example. When my mate Wendy and I got
together, she thought I was carefree, and never worried. She saw me as
calm, spiritual and adventurous. Then after a few years of marriage I
turned into someone who was depressed, worried all the time and was
constantly hassled and overwhelmed. She describes this as "bait and
switch". Well, where do I turn myself in; I was guilty as charged. What
happened to the carefree, confident and attentive person she thought that
I was?

The veil of illusion falls away and it turns out that
our partners have qualities that we can’t bear. Even qualities we once
admired, grate on us. We used to see our partner as independent and
strong, now they seem distant and withdrawn. We used to see our partner as
attentive and affectionate, now they are invasive and "in our business"
all the time. Actually, they didn’t change that much. The power struggle
has begun, and may go on for many years until we split up, settle, or
sometimes if we’re lucky seek help. In the mean time, we drive each other
crazy and negotiate for time, love, chores, space, measuring our success
like some emotional scoreboard, hoping for a better second half.

For most of us, the most primitive parts of our
wonderful brains have a compelling, nonnegotiable drive to restore
ourselves, to heal ourselves and become emotionally and psychologically
whole. Growing up, most of us had good experiences and bad experiences. If
the bad experiences were bad enough, we developed a way of psychologically
defending ourselves. We still carry that imprint into the committed
relationship. That’s right, your childhood defenses show up in your
romantic relationships.
When we meet our special someone and have behaved
ourselves long enough, we start to feel safe. You know what I’m talking
about. When the relationship is young, we might clean up the place when
the beloved is coming over. Or, we might monitor little nasty habits we
have (nose picking, burping in public, strutting, un-politically correct
comments). We might look more organized than we are, or cleaner, or
thrifty, or attentive. At this point, usually when the commitment between
a couple deepens, we will, without being aware of our actions, recreate
situations and experiences in which our needs and emotional desires are
unmet. We do this in the service of our "old brain", in order to have
another chance to "get it right" this time.
But that’s not all the bad news, we also tend to
select partners who have qualities that are missing in
ourselves. So if I am attracted to Wendy’s fun loving, friendly way of
life, it is probable that I admire those qualities because I am too
serious and aloof myself. Well, sure enough, once in the power struggle,
what once looked like "fun loving" and "friendly" now appears
"irresponsible" and "insincere". Did Wendy really change? Not really, but
as our relationship matures, the real work of learning how to love another
incompatible human being begins. It is not easy, and it is not for
sissies.


Don’t get personal. Romantic love is wonderful and
one of the most powerful drives in the universe, but we have
misrepresented what it really is. Besides keeping many mediocre
playwrights and songwriters employed, romantic love is the glue that
initially bonds two incompatible people together so that they will do what
needs to be done to heal themselves, and in the process maybe help our
society. Romantic love is supposed to happen and supposed to end. It is
the end of romantic love that we seldom idealize or if we do write songs
about it, we are only trying to get over ourselves so we can move on to
the next incompatible person, so we can try again there.

No, of course not. Romantic Love is supposed to
happen and supposed to end. And the Power Struggle within a couple is
supposed to happen and supposed to end, or better said: change. However,
the key to managing your Power Struggle is the willingness and the ability
to change your defenses, give your partner what they really want and to
ask for what you really want. Most of the time when we get frustrated, we
respond with criticizing, ridiculing or demands, ultimatums, threats,
blackmail, depression and moping (one of my personal favorites). The goal
is to have a conscious relationship, and to end all criticism. Criticizing
can be entertaining and let off a little pressure, but it has little to do
with real change.

Our culture would have us do just that. Incompatibility is grounds for
divorce, but this idea counters nature’s intention. Divorce is societies’
institutionalized response to the childish wish for idealized,
conflict-free relationships that never change. Incompatibility is the
natural state. Learning how to grow up and manage the incompatibility and
love someone different from yourself is the true challenge of nature and
our societies’ next evolutionary challenge. Divorce does not solve
marriage problems. You can get rid of the partner, but you keep your own
problems, pulling them along into the next relationship.


|
|